Respiratory infections remain a critical health concern for children, particularly infants and toddlers, with a notable impact on hospitalizations linked to respiratory complications. Wheezing, an early sign of airway obstruction, often accompanies these infections and underscores the need to discern the underlying causative pathogens accurately. While Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) has long been considered a predominant cause of such infections, a broader scope reveals other pathogens, including Mycoplasma pneumoniae, human metapneumovirus (hMPV), and influenza viruses, all contributing to respiratory distress in children. Notably, rhinoviruses (HRV) are increasingly observed alongside RSV in children hospitalized with wheezing, positioning them as significant players in the clinical landscape.

Investigations into the viral underpinnings of pediatric respiratory illnesses have pinpointed HRV as a strong predictor for subsequent wheezing and asthma in later years. This correlation suggests that HRV’s influence extends beyond acute episodes, raising concerns about its long-term respiratory impact. The intricate nature of HRV, coupled with its variable impact, challenges the traditional approach to pediatric respiratory infection management and calls for more nuanced diagnostic strategies.

HRV belongs to the Enterovirus (EV) genus within the Picornaviridae family, which comprises three distinct species—HRV-A, HRV-B, and HRV-C. The HRV genome exhibits remarkable diversity, with over 160 known types, inclusive of 99 classic HRV-A and HRV-B types alongside various novel genotypes. The presence of such genetic variability within HRV strains presents unique challenges to accurately identifying and understanding HRV-related respiratory infections. For instance, the existing HRV classification has revealed six novel HRV-A genotypes, five HRV-B genotypes, and 51 HRV-C genotypes, highlighting the virus’s genetic complexity and its adaptability in diverse environments.

Historically, HRV infections were classified using serotyping, which relied on neutralization assays to identify specific immune responses to different viral types. However, molecular techniques, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, have become the primary tool for HRV detection. PCR methods enable the identification of HRV genotypes by targeting the virus’s genetic sequence, a strategy that has greatly enhanced the precision and scope of viral classification efforts. This shift from serotyping to molecular techniques is particularly advantageous in distinguishing the HRV strains circulating within pediatric populations, providing a deeper understanding of their role in respiratory illness.

PCR technology, especially the real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), has emerged as a cornerstone of modern virology, bringing accuracy and efficiency to HRV detection. By focusing on specific genetic markers, particularly the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and the viral capsid proteins (VP) of HRV, researchers can differentiate between HRV species with a high degree of reliability. The 5′ UTR sequence serves as a frequent target for genotyping, though it is prone to nonspecific amplification, particularly in samples with high human RNA concentrations. This limitation notwithstanding, PCR remains instrumental in detecting HRV with clinical samples, as it identifies both familiar and previously uncharacterized HRV types, enriching our understanding of the virus’s evolving epidemiological profile.

Additionally, viral capsid protein (VP) regions such as VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4 have been pivotal in advancing HRV classification. The VP1 sequence, in particular, has proven invaluable, as it allows for distinct differentiation between HRV species based on a 25% nucleotide and 12% amino acid divergence threshold. This method has facilitated the classification of new EV types within the HRV family, which is essential for tracking potential viral recombination events that can impact HRV pathogenicity and spread. Notably, while attempts to classify HRV based on VP2 sequences have encountered challenges, the VP1-targeted approach continues to show promise, underlining the need for specificity when employing molecular genotyping in clinical diagnostics.

The diversity observed among HRV types underscores the necessity of a refined approach in clinical virology that recognizes the virus’s intricate biological and clinical implications. This new understanding reveals that not all HRV types yield identical clinical manifestations, emphasizing the need to consider HRV types as distinct entities rather than a homogeneous group. Although conclusive links between specific HRV types and particular clinical symptoms remain elusive, the expansion of clinical data could eventually support correlations between HRV types and disease severity.

Given HRV’s expanding role in severe respiratory illnesses, it may become essential to incorporate routine HRV screening into clinical settings to identify types with increased virulence or a predisposition for severe outcomes. In this context, large-scale epidemiological studies would be instrumental in mapping HRV circulation patterns and establishing connections between viral genotypes and patient outcomes. Furthermore, the ability to monitor nosocomial transmission and investigate outbreak origins at a molecular level could provide invaluable insight into HRV epidemiology, ultimately informing public health strategies.

RNA samples from patients with the highest viral loads underwent high-throughput sequencing to capture a broad overview of host transcriptomic responses. Quality control metrics confirmed excellent sequence depth and coverage, ensuring comprehensive genomic data with minimal sequencing errors. Alignment to RSV, HRV, and FLU reference genomes provided precise viral identification and allowed for an accurate assessment of differential gene expression in response to each pathogen.

Detailed analysis of gene expression profiles revealed significant activation of immune pathways across all viral infections, with notable upregulation in genes associated with the interferon response, antigen processing, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. RSV infections presented the most robust interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression profile, implicating a more vigorous innate immune activation than observed in HRV and FLU cases. FLU infection, while marked by interferon-related gene upregulation, also triggered genes associated with cell death and apoptotic pathways, suggesting a distinct, possibly more cytotoxic immune response.

Further, HRV infection displayed comparatively milder immune pathway activation, aligning with clinical observations of less severe symptoms relative to RSV. These findings suggest that the varying severities of bronchiolitis symptoms may correspond with specific immune activation pathways influenced by viral etiology.

Cytokine profiling underscored pathogen-specific immune responses, with RSV infection generating the highest levels of IL-6 and TNF-α. Notably, RSV-infected samples also exhibited increased production of chemokines, including CXCL10 and CCL5, which facilitate immune cell recruitment to infection sites. In contrast, FLU-infected samples showed heightened levels of IFN-γ and related Th1 cytokines, indicative of a strong adaptive immune response. Immune marker analysis revealed increased CD4+ T-cell and CD8+ T-cell activation in FLU cases, reflecting a more balanced yet vigorous adaptive response compared to RSV.

Immunophenotyping further highlighted the differential cellular immune landscape among the infections. RSV infections were marked by pronounced neutrophilic infiltration and monocyte activation, while HRV exhibited lower immune activation signatures. FLU infection was associated with increased dendritic cell activity and heightened antigen presentation, likely supporting the robust adaptive response identified.

This study provides a multidimensional characterization of the immune landscape in pediatric bronchiolitis across RSV, HRV, and FLU infections, emphasizing the distinct immunological pathways activated by each virus. The heightened interferon response observed in RSV aligns with its clinical severity and prolonged symptoms in bronchiolitis patients, as interferon-driven pathways are known to contribute to airway inflammation and immune cell infiltration.

FLU’s unique cytokine profile and Th1-skewed immune response, including elevated IFN-γ levels, suggest a rapid mobilization of the adaptive immune system that may aid in clearing the virus. The milder immune activation in HRV-infected samples, marked by lower interferon and cytokine levels, aligns with its comparatively mild clinical presentation, suggesting that less intense immune activation may correlate with reduced airway pathology.

Immune Marker Implications: The observed differences in immune cell recruitment and cytokine production offer insights into pathogen-specific immune mechanisms. The marked neutrophilic and monocytic activation in RSV may explain the exacerbated respiratory symptoms commonly associated with this infection, while FLU’s increased T-cell and dendritic cell responses suggest a more adaptive-driven immune approach, possibly moderating its pathology through efficient viral clearance.

This comparative analysis of immune responses in pediatric bronchiolitis reveals significant heterogeneity in the host response to RSV, HRV, and FLU infections. The differential expression of interferon-stimulated genes, cytokines, and immune markers underscores pathogen-specific pathways that likely contribute to the clinical variability observed in bronchiolitis severity.

Findings from this study enhance our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of viral bronchiolitis, offering potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Targeting specific immune pathways activated in RSV could mitigate the severity of inflammation and improve patient outcomes, whereas bolstering adaptive immune responses in FLU may enhance viral clearance efficiency. Further research into these pathogen-specific immune responses could inform tailored therapeutic strategies to address the unique immunopathology of each viral infection.

Study DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123909

Engr. Dex Marco Tiu Guibelondo, B.Sc. Pharm, R.Ph., B.Sc. CpE

Editor-in-Chief, PharmaFEATURES

Register your interest [here] at Proventa International’s Clinical Operations and Clinical Trials Supply Chain Strategy Meeting this 14th of November 2024 at Le Meridien Boston Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA to engage with thought leaders and like-minded peers on the latest developments in the clinical space and regulatory affairs.

Share this:

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settings