As we mark the passage of almost 53 years since the inception of the “war on cancer,” reflections on the progress and challenges in cancer drug development illuminate both triumphs and hurdles. This pivotal endeavor, catalyzed by the National Cancer Act of 1971 (December 23), has seen remarkable strides propelled by advancements in supportive care, drug innovations, and early detection methods.

National Cancer Act of 1971. Click on the photograph above to browse the entire law.

However, amidst these achievements loom the shadows of a modern era marked by shifting environmental dynamics, lifestyle modifications, and dietary changes, potentially fueling a concerning surge in early-onset cancers, thus heralding what some experts perceive as an emerging global health crisis.

The Evolution of Anticancer Armamentarium: A Historical Perspective

Conventional Chemotherapy

Since its inception in the late 1940s, conventional chemotherapy has stood as a cornerstone in cancer treatment, wielding a diverse arsenal comprising alkylating agents, antimetabolites, natural products, and hormonal interventions. Despite its efficacy in targeting rapidly dividing cancer cells, its non-specific nature indiscriminately affects healthy tissues, leading to debilitating side effects. Despite these limitations, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains a prevalent modality in contemporary oncology.

Cell cycle and cancer. Katzung, B. (2018). Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition. USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
Cell cycle effects of major classes of anti-cancer drugs. Katzung, B. (2018). Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 14th Edition. USA: McGraw-Hill Education.

Targeted Therapies

The advent of targeted therapies in the late 1980s heralded a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, premised on the identification and exploitation of unique molecular targets within cancer cells. Exemplifying this approach is the success story of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), a BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which revolutionized the treatment landscape for certain malignancies. However, while targeted therapies have showcased promising results in preclinical models, their translation into clinical efficacy has been inconsistent, underscoring the complexity of cancer biology.

Novel model of Gleevec binding to tyrosine kinases with quantification of individual steps. (A) Top: Crystal structure (4CSV) (Wilson et al., 2015) of last common ancestor of Src and Abl (ANC-AS) bound to Gleevec (magenta); the DFG loop is shown in stick. Bottom: DFG-loop in the-in (2SRC) and-out (4CSV) conformation is shown with Gleevec bound (magenta surface). Only the DFG-out conformation is compatible with Gleevec binding. (B-D) Binding and dissociation kinetics of Gleevec to Abl and Src measured by stopped-flow fluorescence (for details see Agafonov et al., 2014). (B) Gleevec binding to Abl at 5 • C is biphasic with the fast phase corresponding to the physical binding step and slow phase. Agafonov RV, Wilson C and Kern D (2015) Evolution and intelligent design in drug development. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2:27. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00027.

Immunotherapy and Gene Editing

Immunotherapy, epitomized by immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T cell therapy, represents a revolutionary frontier in cancer therapeutics, harnessing the body’s immune system to combat malignancies. While yielding unprecedented responses in select patient cohorts, challenges such as long-term toxicity and limited efficacy in solid tumors temper the enthusiasm surrounding these modalities.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor. Checkpoint proteins, such as PD-L1 on tumor cells and PD-1 on T cells, help keep immune responses in check. The binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 keeps T cells from killing tumor cells in the body (left panel). Blocking the binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1) allows the T cells to kill tumor cells (right panel). Retrieved from https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/immune-checkpoint-inhibitor.
CAR T-Cell Therapy Infographic. This illustration shows the steps for creating CAR T-cell therapy, a type of treatment in which a patient’s T cells (a type of immune system cell) are changed in the laboratory so they will attack cancer cells. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.gov/research/annual-plan/scientific-topics/cell-therapy/car-t-cell-therapy-infographic.
FDA Approved CAR T Cell Therapies. CAR T Cells: Engineering Patients’ Immune Cells to Treat Their Cancers. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/research/car-t-cells.

Meanwhile, the advent of CRISPR-based gene editing technologies offers tantalizing prospects for precise genomic manipulation in cancer treatment, with ongoing clinical trials exploring their potential across diverse malignancies.

Infographic – What is Crispr? Retrieved from https://sciencebusiness.technewslit.com/?p=35920.

Charting the Course Ahead: Toward Hybrid Strategies and Technological Integration

Hybrid Warfare in Drug Development

The future landscape of cancer drug development envisages a hybrid approach, synergizing traditional cytotoxic agents with innovative targeted therapies and immunomodulatory interventions. Embracing tailored treatment regimens informed by individualized molecular profiling and microbiome analysis holds promise in optimizing therapeutic outcomes and mitigating adverse effects.

Harnessing Big Data and Artificial Intelligence

The integration of big data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) stands poised to revolutionize drug discovery and development paradigms. Leveraging vast repositories of biomedical data, AI algorithms offer invaluable insights into target identification, drug design, and repurposing endeavors. However, challenges pertaining to data quality, regulatory compliance, and infrastructural investments underscore the imperative for judicious utilization of AI-driven methodologies in tandem with human expertise.

Embracing Human Creativity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

The teamwork between human creativity and AI promises a future of joint innovation in cancer drug development. Although AI has huge potential in making drug discovery and treatment better, its success relies on working closely with human expertise. Even with advanced technology, the core of cancer drug development is still about reducing human suffering and facing the many challenges of this disease together.

Engr. Dex Marco Tiu Guibelondo, B.Sc. Pharm, R.Ph., B.Sc. CpE

Editor-in-Chief, PharmaFEATURES

Share this:

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settings